Sunday, March 6, 2011

Robert Fisk Article About Saudi Arabia

The following article was written by Robert Fisk and was published March 5, 2011, in The Independent. Mr. Fisk is a British author and award-winning journalist who has been an international news reporter for many years and knows intimately the politics and workings of the Middle East region.

Saudis Mobilise Thousands of Troops to Quell Growing Revolt

By Robert Fisk, Middle East Correspondent for The Independent

Saudi Arabia was yesterday drafting up to 10,000 security personnel into its north-eastern Shia Muslim provinces, clogging the highways into Dammam and other cities with busloads of troops in fear of next week's "day of rage" by what is now called the "Hunayn Revolution".

Saudi Arabia's worst nightmare – the arrival of the new Arab awakening of rebellion and insurrection in the kingdom – is now casting its long shadow over the House of Saud. Provoked by the Shia majority uprising in the neighbouring Sunni-dominated island of Bahrain, where protesters are calling for the overthrow of the ruling al-Khalifa family, King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia is widely reported to have told the Bahraini authorities that if they do not crush their Shia revolt, his own forces will.

The opposition is expecting at least 20,000 Saudis to gather in Riyadh and in the Shia Muslim provinces of the north-east of the country in six days, to demand an end to corruption and, if necessary, the overthrow of the House of Saud. Saudi security forces have deployed troops and armed police across the Qatif area – where most of Saudi Arabia's Shia Muslims live – and yesterday would-be protesters circulated photographs of armoured vehicles and buses of the state-security police on a highway near the port city of Dammam.

Although desperate to avoid any outside news of the extent of the protests spreading, Saudi security officials have known for more than a month that the revolt of Shia Muslims in the tiny island of Bahrain was expected to spread to Saudi Arabia. Within the Saudi kingdom, thousands of emails and Facebook messages have encouraged Saudi Sunni Muslims to join the planned demonstrations across the "conservative" and highly corrupt kingdom. They suggest – and this idea is clearly co-ordinated – that during confrontations with armed police or the army next Friday, Saudi women should be placed among the front ranks of the protesters to dissuade the Saudi security forces from opening fire.

If the Saudi royal family decides to use maximum violence against demonstrators, US President Barack Obama will be confronted by one of the most sensitive Middle East decisions of his administration. In Egypt, he only supported the demonstrators after the police used unrestrained firepower against protesters. But in Saudi Arabia – supposedly a "key ally" of the US and one of the world's principal oil producers – he will be loath to protect the innocent.

So far, the Saudi authorities have tried to dissuade their own people from supporting the 11 March demonstrations on the grounds that many protesters are "Iraqis and Iranians". It's the same old story used by Ben Ali of Tunisia and Mubarak of Egypt and Bouteflika of Algeria and Saleh of Yemen and the al-Khalifas of Bahrain: "foreign hands" are behind every democratic insurrection in the Middle East.

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Mr Obama will be gritting their teeth next Friday in the hope that either the protesters appear in small numbers or that the Saudis "restrain" their cops and security; history suggests this is unlikely. When Saudi academics have in the past merely called for reforms, they have been harassed or arrested. King Abdullah, albeit a very old man, does not brook rebel lords or restive serfs telling him to make concessions to youth. His £27bn bribe of improved education and housing subsidies is unlikely to meet their demands.

An indication of the seriousness of the revolt against the Saudi royal family comes in its chosen title: Hunayn. This is a valley near Mecca, the scene of one of the last major battles of the Prophet Mohamed against a confederation of Bedouins in AD630. The Prophet won a tight victory after his men were fearful of their opponents. The reference in the Koran, 9: 25-26, as translated by Tarif el-Khalidi, contains a lesson for the Saudi princes: "God gave you victory on many battlefields. Recall the day of Hunayn when you fancied your great numbers.

"So the earth, with all its wide expanse, narrowed before you and you turned tail and fled. Then God made his serenity to descend upon his Messenger and the believers, and sent down troops you did not see – and punished the unbelievers." The unbelievers, of course, are supposed – in the eyes of the Hunayn Revolution – to be the King and his thousand princes.

Like almost every other Arab potentate over the past three months, King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia suddenly produced economic bribes and promised reforms when his enemy was at the gates. Can the Arabs be bribed? Their leaders can, perhaps, especially when, in the case of Egypt, Washington was offering it the largest handout of dollars – $1.5bn (£800m) – after Israel. But when the money rarely trickles down to impoverished and increasingly educated youth, past promises are recalled and mocked. With oil prices touching $120 a barrel and the Libyan debacle lowering its production by up to 75 per cent, the serious economic – and moral, should this interest the Western powers – question, is how long the "civilised world" can go on supporting the nation whose citizens made up almost all of the suicide killers of 9/11?

The Arabian peninsula gave the world the Prophet and the Arab Revolt against the Ottomans and the Taliban and 9/11 and – let us speak the truth – al-Qa'ida. This week's protests in the kingdom will therefore affect us all – but none more so than the supposedly conservative and definitely hypocritical pseudo-state, run by a company without shareholders called the House of Saud.


  1. As expats, we do sicerely wish the Saudis well. Hope peace prevails.

  2. Susie...that is going to be some situation. I hope all is well with you now, and that it stays that way.

  3. `
    The next few weeks (or week) should be interesting and will set the tone for government response to minority demands. I hope it doesn't get violent.

    Interesting times, these!


  4. I'd hoped there would have been some kind of protest in SA. Also heard the Sauds gave money to the citizens NOT to protest. Any truth to that story?

  5. Janice: haha - it is ridiculous. Saudi authorities announced any kind of demonstrations is illegal and forbidden, not in accordance with sharia and Saudi customs, as it leads to blood shed, violence and private and governmental property damage. People can voice their complains in legal manner - through dialogue or petitions.

  6. Your many readers will be thinking of you on Friday. Keep the news coming.

  7. “O you who believe! If you give victory to God, He will give victory to you and make you stand firm.” (47:7).

  8. i don't know how a shallow person like this become a famous writer ?
    He got information about how people feel in Saudi from people who left Saudi 40 years ago!! Come on for God's Sake! And by following facebook pages that is against the king without seeing the pages the support the king and the royal family.
    The 5% ( this is even an exaggeration of their number) who are against the king and wanna protest are in genrally aganist the main stream Saudi Arabia, I mean if the forces don't break up the pretests, the people will do. To be more clear, if the Shite goes in protest in big downtown AL-hassa or even come close in the sunnie towns in Qtif ( the biggest Sunni town in Qatif is Annak ) it will be the end of these protesters, and it will turn ugly. Big cities and cities dominated by Sunni, will shoe the greatest loyalty to their land and King.
    Talk to real Saudis who grew up there and still live there, even to Saudi Students abroad and you will see what is the real image is.

    God Bless Saudi and the King

  9. This is a response to “Anonymous” above:
    "It will be the end of these protesters"
    How proud is this voice of the intolerance of the other and the suppression of free expression.
    In a civilized community and a country were law rules, it will not be the end of protestors to pass by people who disagree with them. The law, guaranteeing free expression and speech, even for those who are “against the main stream”, would be protecting them.
    When such a mentality, of which you are a good sample, prevails, people pride themselves in oppressing minorities and see it as a sign of might. To oppress a disagreeing voice is their victory.
    The writer never claimed he knows how the majority feel. He claimed that the regime fears protests and that’s evident enough in the level of mobilization of police forces and troops.

  10. I have tremendous respect for Robert Fisk and he is truely one of the most knowledgeable and well spoken/written journalists of the modern era but he has severely overstepped his knowledge and made the same mistake the "protesters" of Saudi made by believing that revolutions simply happen if people are discontent. If that were true then no countries would have tyrants for more than a few years.